Categories
CVE-2026-71852 low CVSS 3.3

Vulnerability in pypdf (CVE-2026-71852)

Summary

Vulnerability in pypdf (CVE-2026-71852). Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure. Mitigation: upgrade to 6.15.0 or later.

Original description

The description as published by the source.

Impact

An attacker who uses this vulnerability can craft a PDF which leads to long runtimes and large memory consumption. This requires parsing the font width entries of a font with unusually large values, for example during text extraction.

Patches

This has been fixed in pypdf==6.15.0.

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade yet, consider applying the changes from PR #3946.

Source: GitHub Security Advisories (Global) NVD GitHub Advisory

Auto-generated summary

Assembled by SecPulse from the source data (CVSS, CWE, affected versions) using templates — no AI involved. Check the original description and references below for exact details.

A vulnerability tracked as CVE-2026-71852 has been found in pypdf.
Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure. CVSS score: 3.3/10.
What to do: upgrade pypdf to 6.15.0 or later.
If unsure, ask your IT team or search "pypdf CVE-2026-71852" on the vendor's site.

CVE-2026-71852 (pypdf) — CWE-834 / CVSS v3 3.3
Attack vector: local / unauthenticated
Patched: 6.15.0 — apply immediately
Workaround: If you cannot upgrade yet, consider applying the changes from PR #3946.
Plan: 1) Audit SBOM/dependencies, 2) Stage→prod upgrade, 3) Add WAF/proxy monitoring on affected endpoints, 4) Hunt IOCs in logs.
Refs: see the GHSA / vendor advisory / patched release linked on this page.

❓ What is the problem

A vulnerability (CWE-834) exists in pypdf.

📍 Affected scope

Check the vendor advisory for the affected versions of pypdf.

🔥 Severity

Severity: Low (CVSS 3.3/10). Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure.

🔧 How to fix

Update to 6.15.0.

🛡️ Workaround

Workaround: If you cannot upgrade yet, consider applying the changes from PR #3946.

🔍 Detection

Search webserver/proxy logs for unusual request patterns matching this CVE's known IOCs. Run grep -r 'pypdf' . against your dependency files (package-lock.json, requirements.txt, go.sum) to find affected services.

Response actions

Concrete steps and command examples for SOC/SRE teams to execute in order

  1. 1
    Identify exposure identify
    grep -r 'pypdf' . | grep -v node_modules

    リポジトリと本番環境の依存ファイル (package-lock.json / requirements.txt / go.sum / Gemfile.lock 等) で pypdf を grep し、稼働しているサービス・バージョンを把握する。

  2. 2
    Apply temporary workaround mitigate
    If you cannot upgrade yet, consider applying the changes from PR [#3946](https://github.com/py-pdf/pypdf/pull/3946).

    パッチが適用されるまでの応急処置として、If you cannot upgrade yet, consider applying the changes from PR #3946. を実施。回避策の副作用 (機能低下) を確認した上で。

  3. 3
    Apply patch patch
    Upgrade pypdf to 6.15.0

    ステージング環境で 6.15.0 に上げて回帰テスト → 本番反映。回帰テストはアプリの主要ハッピーパスを含めること。

  4. 4
    Post-deployment verification verify
    Confirm patched version is live in production

    パッチ適用後、ステージングで PoC または同等の悪用パターンを再現して脆弱性が閉じたことを確認。本番ではアクセスログ・WAF でアラート再発が無いか継続監視。

Affected packages

pip pypdf
[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.15.0"}]}]
PyPI pypdf
[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"6.15.0"}]}]

References

We use cookies for analytics and ad measurement. This setting applies to all Game co., Ltd. sites. Details