Categories
CVE-2020-8929

Vulnerability in com.google.crypto.tink:tink (CVE-2020-8929)

Summary

Vulnerability in com.google.crypto.tink:tink (CVE-2020-8929). Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure. Mitigation: upgrade to 1.5.0 or later.

Original description

The description as published by the source.

A mis-handling of invalid unicode characters in the Java implementation of Tink versions prior to 1.5 allows an attacker to change the ID part of a ciphertext, which result in the creation of a second ciphertext that can decrypt to the same plaintext. This can be a problem with encrypting deterministic AEAD with a single key, and rely on a unique ciphertext-per-plaintext.

Source: OSV.dev (Open Source Vulnerabilities) NVD GitHub Advisory OSV

Auto-generated summary

Assembled by SecPulse from the source data (CVSS, CWE, affected versions) using templates — no AI involved. Check the original description and references below for exact details.

A vulnerability tracked as CVE-2020-8929 has been found in com.google.crypto.tink:tink.
Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure.
What to do: upgrade com.google.crypto.tink:tink to 1.5.0 or later.
If unsure, ask your IT team or search "com.google.crypto.tink:tink CVE-2020-8929" on the vendor's site.

CVE-2020-8929 (com.google.crypto.tink:tink) — CWE-176
Attack vector: remote (network-reachable) / unauthenticated / no user interaction
Patched: 1.5.0 — apply immediately
Plan: 1) Audit SBOM/dependencies, 2) Stage→prod upgrade, 3) Add WAF/proxy monitoring on affected endpoints, 4) Hunt IOCs in logs.
Refs: see the GHSA / vendor advisory / patched release linked on this page.

❓ What is the problem

A vulnerability (CWE-176) exists in com.google.crypto.tink:tink.

📍 Affected scope

Check the vendor advisory for the affected versions of com.google.crypto.tink:tink.

🔥 Severity

Severity: ?. Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure.

🔧 How to fix

Update to 1.5.0.

🛡️ Workaround

Until the patch is applied: disable the affected feature, apply WAF rules, or restrict access via network ACLs.

🔍 Detection

Search webserver/proxy logs for unusual request patterns matching this CVE's known IOCs. Audit SBOM/dependencies to find affected services.

Response actions

Concrete steps and command examples for SOC/SRE teams to execute in order

  1. 1
    Identify exposure identify
    Audit SBOM/dependencies for affected components.

    資産台帳・SBOM・依存マニフェストで com.google.crypto.tink:tink を使っているサービスとバージョンを洗い出す。

  2. 2
    Apply patch patch
    Upgrade com.google.crypto.tink:tink to 1.5.0

    ステージング環境で 1.5.0 に上げて回帰テスト → 本番反映。回帰テストはアプリの主要ハッピーパスを含めること。

  3. 3
    Post-deployment verification verify
    Confirm patched version is live in production

    パッチ適用後、ステージングで PoC または同等の悪用パターンを再現して脆弱性が閉じたことを確認。本番ではアクセスログ・WAF でアラート再発が無いか継続監視。

Affected packages

Maven com.google.crypto.tink:tink
[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.5.0"}]}]

References

We use cookies for analytics and ad measurement. This setting applies to all Game co., Ltd. sites. Details