Categories
CVE-2026-44219 low CVSS 3.7

Vulnerability in ciguard (CVE-2026-44219)

Summary

Vulnerability in ciguard (CVE-2026-44219). Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure. Exploitable via None. Mitigation: upgrade to 0.8.2 or later.

Original description

The description as published by the source.

ciguard is a static security auditor for CI/CD pipelines. From 0.6.0 to 0.8.1, both SCA HTTP clients (src/ciguard/analyzer/sca/osv.py and src/ciguard/analyzer/sca/endoflife.py) call payload = json.loads(resp.read().decode('utf-8')) without a maximum-bytes cap. A hostile or compromised endoflife.date / OSV.dev (or a successful TLS MITM) could return a multi-GB response, exhausting the ciguard process's memory. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.8.2.

Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database NVD GitHub Advisory

Auto-generated summary

Assembled by SecPulse from the source data (CVSS, CWE, affected versions) using templates — no AI involved. Check the original description and references below for exact details.

A vulnerability tracked as CVE-2026-44219 has been found in ciguard.
Attackers can target a specific entry point like None over the network to misuse the product.
Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure. CVSS score: 3.7/10.
What to do: upgrade ciguard to 0.8.2 or later.
If unsure, ask your IT team or search "ciguard CVE-2026-44219" on the vendor's site.

CVE-2026-44219 (ciguard) — CWE-770 / CVSS v3 3.7
Attack vector: remote (network-reachable) / unauthenticated / no user interaction
Attack surface: None / urllib.request.urlopen / _fetch
Patched: 0.8.2 — apply immediately
Plan: 1) Audit SBOM/dependencies, 2) Stage→prod upgrade, 3) Add WAF/proxy monitoring on affected endpoints, 4) Hunt IOCs in logs.
Refs: see the GHSA / vendor advisory / patched release linked on this page.

❓ What is the problem

A vulnerability (CWE-770) exists in ciguard. Attackers reach the vulnerable code path via None without authentication.

📍 Affected scope

Check the vendor advisory for the affected versions of ciguard. Attack surface: None / urllib.request.urlopen / _fetch.

🔥 Severity

Severity: Low (CVSS 3.7/10). Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure.

🔧 How to fix

Update to 0.8.2.

🛡️ Workaround

Until the patch is applied: disable the affected feature, apply WAF rules, or restrict access via network ACLs.

🔍 Detection

Search webserver/proxy logs for unusual request patterns matching this CVE's known IOCs. Run grep -r 'ciguard' . against your dependency files (package-lock.json, requirements.txt, go.sum) to find affected services.

Response actions

Concrete steps and command examples for SOC/SRE teams to execute in order

  1. 1
    Identify exposure identify
    grep -r 'ciguard' . | grep -v node_modules

    リポジトリと本番環境の依存ファイル (package-lock.json / requirements.txt / go.sum / Gemfile.lock 等) で ciguard を grep し、稼働しているサービス・バージョンを把握する。

  2. 2
    Apply patch patch
    Upgrade ciguard to 0.8.2

    ステージング環境で 0.8.2 に上げて回帰テスト → 本番反映。回帰テストはアプリの主要ハッピーパスを含めること。

  3. 3
    Post-deployment verification verify
    Confirm patched version is live in production

    パッチ適用後、ステージングで PoC または同等の悪用パターンを再現して脆弱性が閉じたことを確認。本番ではアクセスログ・WAF でアラート再発が無いか継続監視。

Affected packages

pip ciguard
[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.8.2"}]}]
PyPI ciguard
[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0.6.0"},{"fixed":"0.8.2"}]}]

References

We use cookies for analytics and ad measurement. This setting applies to all Game co., Ltd. sites. Details