Categories
CVE-2026-49819 critical CVSS 9.8

OS Command Injection in UpSnap (CVE-2026-49819)

Summary

OS command injection in UpSnap (CVE-2026-49819). Successful exploitation can lead to full system takeover. Exploitable via POST /api/upsnap/init-superuser.

Original description

The description as published by the source.

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions 4.4.1 through 5.3.5 are vulnerable to a missing-authentication / privilege-escalation chain in pb.HandlerInitSuperuser (backend/pb/handlers.go:249), reachable as POST /api/upsnap/init-superuser. The vulnerable code lacks any authentication, setup token, IP allow-list, or rate limit and is gated only by a totalSuperusers > 0 count check — a condition that is false on every fresh install — allowing an unauthenticated network-adjacent attacker to register the initial superuser account, receive a long-lived JWT, and pivot to root remote code execution at backend/networking/wake.go:43 (exec.CommandContext(ctx, "/bin/sh", "-c", wake_cmd)). Version 5.4.0 fixes the issue.

Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database NVD

Auto-generated summary

Assembled by SecPulse from the source data (CVSS, CWE, affected versions) using templates — no AI involved. Check the original description and references below for exact details.

A vulnerability tracked as CVE-2026-49819 has been found in UpSnap.
Attackers can target a specific entry point like POST /api/upsnap/init-superuser over the network to misuse the product.
Successful exploitation can lead to full system takeover. CVSS score: 9.8/10.
What to do: apply the vendor's official patched release.
If unsure, ask your IT team or search "UpSnap CVE-2026-49819" on the vendor's site.

CVE-2026-49819 (UpSnap) — CWE-78 / CVSS v3 9.8
Attack vector: remote (network-reachable) / unauthenticated / no user interaction
Attack surface: POST /api/upsnap/init-superuser / pb.HandlerInitSuperuser
Plan: 1) Audit SBOM/dependencies, 2) Stage→prod upgrade, 3) Add WAF/proxy monitoring on affected endpoints, 4) Hunt IOCs in logs.
Refs: see the GHSA / vendor advisory / patched release linked on this page.

❓ What is the problem

OS command injection (CWE-78) exists in UpSnap. Attackers reach the vulnerable code path via POST /api/upsnap/init-superuser without authentication.

📍 Affected scope

Check the vendor advisory for the affected versions of UpSnap. Attack surface: POST /api/upsnap/init-superuser / pb.HandlerInitSuperuser.

🔥 Severity

Severity: Critical (CVSS 9.8/10). Successful exploitation can lead to full system takeover.

🔧 How to fix

Update to the patched release per vendor advisory.

🛡️ Workaround

Until the patch is applied: disable the affected feature, apply WAF rules, or restrict access via network ACLs.

🔍 Detection

Search webserver/proxy logs for unusual POST /api/upsnap/init-superuser requests with malformed payloads or SQL meta-characters. Run grep -r 'UpSnap' . against your dependency files (package-lock.json, requirements.txt, go.sum) to find affected services.

Response actions

Concrete steps and command examples for SOC/SRE teams to execute in order

  1. 1
    Identify exposure identify
    grep -r 'UpSnap' . | grep -v node_modules

    リポジトリと本番環境の依存ファイル (package-lock.json / requirements.txt / go.sum / Gemfile.lock 等) で UpSnap を grep し、稼働しているサービス・バージョンを把握する。

  2. 2
    Hunt for indicators of compromise detect
    grep 'POST /api/upsnap/init-superuser' /var/log/nginx/access.log | grep -E '(unusual_payload|sqli_pattern)'

    アクセスログで POST /api/upsnap/init-superuser への異常なリクエスト (不正な認証ヘッダ・SQLメタ文字)を過去 30〜90日分捜索。WAF/SIEM があれば該当パスのアラート発火履歴を確認。

  3. 3
    Post-deployment verification verify
    Replay attack against POST /api/upsnap/init-superuser on staging to confirm patch closes the vector

    パッチ適用後、ステージングで PoC または同等の悪用パターンを再現して脆弱性が閉じたことを確認。本番では Step 2 と同じログクエリでアラート再発が無いか継続監視。

References

We use cookies for analytics and ad measurement. This setting applies to all Game co., Ltd. sites. Details