Categories
CVE-2026-50288

SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) in @asymmetric-effort/specifyjs (CVE-2026-50288)

Summary

SSRF in @asymmetric-effort/specifyjs (CVE-2026-50288). Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure. Exploitable via assertSecureUrl. Mitigation: upgrade to 0.2.136 or later.

Original description

The description as published by the source.

SpecifyJS is a declarative TypeScript user interface framework. Prior to version 0.2.136, when new URL() throws a parse error, the assertSecureUrl function returned without throwing, silently allowing the request to proceed without HTTPS validation. Starting in version 0.2.136, the catch block now throws an error instead of silently returning.

Source: GitHub Security Advisories (Global) NVD GitHub Advisory

Auto-generated summary

Assembled by SecPulse from the source data (CVSS, CWE, affected versions) using templates — no AI involved. Check the original description and references below for exact details.

A vulnerability tracked as CVE-2026-50288 has been found in @asymmetric-effort/specifyjs.
Attackers can target a specific entry point like assertSecureUrl over the network to misuse the product.
Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure.
What to do: upgrade @asymmetric-effort/specifyjs to 0.2.136 or later.
If unsure, ask your IT team or search "@asymmetric-effort/specifyjs CVE-2026-50288" on the vendor's site.

CVE-2026-50288 (@asymmetric-effort/specifyjs) — CWE-918
Attack surface: assertSecureUrl
Patched: 0.2.136 — apply immediately
Plan: 1) Audit SBOM/dependencies, 2) Stage→prod upgrade, 3) Add WAF/proxy monitoring on affected endpoints, 4) Hunt IOCs in logs.
Refs: see the GHSA / vendor advisory / patched release linked on this page.

❓ What is the problem

SSRF (CWE-918) exists in @asymmetric-effort/specifyjs. Attackers reach the vulnerable code path via assertSecureUrl.

📍 Affected scope

Check the vendor advisory for the affected versions of @asymmetric-effort/specifyjs. Attack surface: assertSecureUrl.

🔥 Severity

Severity: ?. Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure.

🔧 How to fix

Update to 0.2.136.

🛡️ Workaround

Until the patch is applied: disable the affected feature, apply WAF rules, or restrict access via network ACLs.

🔍 Detection

Search webserver/proxy logs for unusual request patterns matching this CVE's known IOCs. Run grep -r '@asymmetric-effort/specifyjs' . against your dependency files (package-lock.json, requirements.txt, go.sum) to find affected services.

Response actions

Concrete steps and command examples for SOC/SRE teams to execute in order

  1. 1
    Identify exposure identify
    grep -r '@asymmetric-effort/specifyjs' . | grep -v node_modules

    リポジトリと本番環境の依存ファイル (package-lock.json / requirements.txt / go.sum / Gemfile.lock 等) で @asymmetric-effort/specifyjs を grep し、稼働しているサービス・バージョンを把握する。

  2. 2
    Apply patch patch
    Upgrade @asymmetric-effort/specifyjs to 0.2.136

    ステージング環境で 0.2.136 に上げて回帰テスト → 本番反映。回帰テストはアプリの主要ハッピーパスを含めること。

  3. 3
    Post-deployment verification verify
    Confirm patched version is live in production

    パッチ適用後、ステージングで PoC または同等の悪用パターンを再現して脆弱性が閉じたことを確認。本番ではアクセスログ・WAF でアラート再発が無いか継続監視。

Affected packages

npm @asymmetric-effort/specifyjs
[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"0.2.136"}]}]

References

We use cookies for analytics and ad measurement. This setting applies to all Game co., Ltd. sites. Details