Categories
CVE-2026-54729

SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) in dssrf (CVE-2026-54729)

Summary

SSRF in dssrf (CVE-2026-54729). Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure. Mitigation: upgrade to 1.0.5 or later.

Original description

The description as published by the source.

Summary

is_url_safe can treat localhost as safe when DNS resolver 1.1.1.1 returns NXDOMAIN because dns.resolve4 yields no address and no dns.lookup fallback occurs, allowing server-side request forgery.

POC

Example to simulate 1.1.1.1 in version before 1.5.0 of dssrf:

import { is_url_safe } from '../dist/helpers.js';
import dns from 'dns';

dns.setServers(['1.1.1.1']);

const TARGET = 'http://localhost/admin';

console.log(`Testing: ${TARGET}`);
console.log(`Current DNS Servers: ${dns.getServers()}`);

const result = await is_url_safe(TARGET);

if (result === true) {
    console.log('dssrf treated localhost as SAFE because 1.1.1.1 returned NXDOMAIN.');
} else {
    console.log('dssrf blocked localhost.');
}

Source: GitHub Security Advisories (Global) NVD GitHub Advisory

Auto-generated summary

Assembled by SecPulse from the source data (CVSS, CWE, affected versions) using templates — no AI involved. Check the original description and references below for exact details.

A vulnerability tracked as CVE-2026-54729 has been found in dssrf.
Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure.
What to do: upgrade dssrf to 1.0.5 or later.
If unsure, ask your IT team or search "dssrf CVE-2026-54729" on the vendor's site.

CVE-2026-54729 (dssrf) — CWE-918
Patched: 1.0.5 — apply immediately
Plan: 1) Audit SBOM/dependencies, 2) Stage→prod upgrade, 3) Add WAF/proxy monitoring on affected endpoints, 4) Hunt IOCs in logs.
Refs: see the GHSA / vendor advisory / patched release linked on this page.

❓ What is the problem

SSRF (CWE-918) exists in dssrf.

📍 Affected scope

Check the vendor advisory for the affected versions of dssrf.

🔥 Severity

Severity: ?. Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure.

🔧 How to fix

Update to 1.0.5.

🛡️ Workaround

Until the patch is applied: disable the affected feature, apply WAF rules, or restrict access via network ACLs.

🔍 Detection

Search webserver/proxy logs for unusual request patterns matching this CVE's known IOCs. Run grep -r 'dssrf' . against your dependency files (package-lock.json, requirements.txt, go.sum) to find affected services.

Response actions

Concrete steps and command examples for SOC/SRE teams to execute in order

  1. 1
    Identify exposure identify
    grep -r 'dssrf' . | grep -v node_modules

    リポジトリと本番環境の依存ファイル (package-lock.json / requirements.txt / go.sum / Gemfile.lock 等) で dssrf を grep し、稼働しているサービス・バージョンを把握する。

  2. 2
    Apply patch patch
    Upgrade dssrf to 1.0.5

    ステージング環境で 1.0.5 に上げて回帰テスト → 本番反映。回帰テストはアプリの主要ハッピーパスを含めること。

  3. 3
    Post-deployment verification verify
    Confirm patched version is live in production

    パッチ適用後、ステージングで PoC または同等の悪用パターンを再現して脆弱性が閉じたことを確認。本番ではアクセスログ・WAF でアラート再発が無いか継続監視。

Affected packages

npm dssrf
[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"1.0.5"}]}]

References

We use cookies for analytics and ad measurement. This setting applies to all Game co., Ltd. sites. Details