Categories
CVE-2026-68927 low CVSS 3.0

SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) in mobsf (CVE-2026-68927)

Summary

SSRF in mobsf (CVE-2026-68927). Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure. Exploitable via rebind.example. Mitigation: upgrade to 4.5.1 or later.

Original description

The description as published by the source.

MobSF is a mobile application security testing tool used. Prior to 4.5.1, get_browsable_activities in mobsf/StaticAnalyzer/views/android/manifest_analysis.py validates only an Android manifest android:host value with valid_host before appending a separately supplied android:port to the URL fetched by _check_url, allowing an authenticated user to upload a crafted APK that makes requests to an attacker-selected nonstandard port at /.well-known/assetlinks.json. With an attacker-controlled hostname and DNS rebinding between validation and the requests.get connection, the request can reach an internal service, although redirects remain disabled and the path is fixed. This issue is fixed in version 4.5.1.

Source: GitHub Security Advisories (Global) NVD GitHub Advisory

Auto-generated summary

Assembled by SecPulse from the source data (CVSS, CWE, affected versions) using templates — no AI involved. Check the original description and references below for exact details.

A vulnerability tracked as CVE-2026-68927 has been found in mobsf.
Attackers can target a specific entry point like rebind.example over the network to misuse the product.
Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure. CVSS score: 3.0/10.
What to do: upgrade mobsf to 4.5.1 or later.
If unsure, ask your IT team or search "mobsf CVE-2026-68927" on the vendor's site.

CVE-2026-68927 (mobsf) — CWE-918 / CVSS v3 3.0
Attack vector: remote (network-reachable) / no user interaction
Attack surface: rebind.example / c_url
Patched: 4.5.1 — apply immediately
Plan: 1) Audit SBOM/dependencies, 2) Stage→prod upgrade, 3) Add WAF/proxy monitoring on affected endpoints, 4) Hunt IOCs in logs.
Refs: see the GHSA / vendor advisory / patched release linked on this page.

❓ What is the problem

SSRF (CWE-918) exists in mobsf. Attackers reach the vulnerable code path via rebind.example.

📍 Affected scope

Check the vendor advisory for the affected versions of mobsf. Attack surface: rebind.example / c_url.

🔥 Severity

Severity: Low (CVSS 3.0/10). Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure.

🔧 How to fix

Update to 4.5.1.

🛡️ Workaround

Until the patch is applied: disable the affected feature, apply WAF rules, or restrict access via network ACLs.

🔍 Detection

Search webserver/proxy logs for unusual request patterns matching this CVE's known IOCs. Run grep -r 'mobsf' . against your dependency files (package-lock.json, requirements.txt, go.sum) to find affected services.

Response actions

Concrete steps and command examples for SOC/SRE teams to execute in order

  1. 1
    Identify exposure identify
    grep -r 'mobsf' . | grep -v node_modules

    リポジトリと本番環境の依存ファイル (package-lock.json / requirements.txt / go.sum / Gemfile.lock 等) で mobsf を grep し、稼働しているサービス・バージョンを把握する。

  2. 2
    Apply patch patch
    Upgrade mobsf to 4.5.1

    ステージング環境で 4.5.1 に上げて回帰テスト → 本番反映。回帰テストはアプリの主要ハッピーパスを含めること。

  3. 3
    Post-deployment verification verify
    Confirm patched version is live in production

    パッチ適用後、ステージングで PoC または同等の悪用パターンを再現して脆弱性が閉じたことを確認。本番ではアクセスログ・WAF でアラート再発が無いか継続監視。

Affected packages

pip mobsf
[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"4.5.1"}]}]
PyPI mobsf
[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"4.5.1"}]}]

References

We use cookies for analytics and ad measurement. This setting applies to all Game co., Ltd. sites. Details