← Back
CVE-2026-81889
high
CVSS 8.6
SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) in studio-42/elfinder (CVE-2026-81889)
Summary
SSRF in studio-42/elfinder (CVE-2026-81889). Confidential information can be exposed externally. Exploitable via `GET /secret.txt`. Mitigation: upgrade to `2.1.70` or later.
AI summary snake-internal / snake-material-v2
A vulnerability tracked as **CVE-2026-81889** has been found in studio-42/elfinder.
Attackers can target a specific entry point like `GET /secret.txt` over the network to misuse the product.
Confidential information can be exposed externally. CVSS score: 8.6/10.
What to do: upgrade studio-42/elfinder to **2.1.70** or later.
If unsure, ask your IT team or search "studio-42/elfinder CVE-2026-81889" on the vendor's site.
CVE-2026-81889 (studio-42/elfinder) — CWE-918 / CVSS v3 8.6
Attack vector: remote (network-reachable) / unauthenticated / no user interaction
Attack surface: GET /secret.txt / `master` / `CURLOPT_RESOLVE` / `poc.zip`
Patched: `2.1.70` — apply immediately
Plan: 1) Audit SBOM/dependencies, 2) Stage→prod upgrade, 3) Add WAF/proxy monitoring on affected endpoints, 4) Hunt IOCs in logs.
Refs: see the GHSA / vendor advisory / patched release linked on this page.
❓ What is the problem
**SSRF** (CWE-918) exists in studio-42/elfinder. Attackers reach the vulnerable code path via `GET /secret.txt` without authentication.
📍 Affected scope
studio-42/elfinder — . Attack surface: GET /secret.txt / `master` / `CURLOPT_RESOLVE` / `poc.zip`.
🔥 Severity
Severity: High (CVSS 8.6/10). Confidential information can be exposed externally
🔧 How to fix
Update to **2.1.70**.
🛡️ Workaround
Until the patch is applied: disable the affected feature, apply WAF rules, or restrict access via network ACLs.
🔍 Detection
Search webserver/proxy logs for unusual `GET /secret.txt` requests with malformed payloads or SQL meta-characters. Run `grep -r 'studio-42/elfinder' .` against your dependency files (package-lock.json, requirements.txt, go.sum) to find affected services.
Response Actions (7 steps)
Concrete steps and command examples for SOC/SRE teams to execute in order
-
1Identify exposure identify
grep -r 'studio-42/elfinder' . | grep -v node_modulesリポジトリと本番環境の依存ファイル (package-lock.json / requirements.txt / go.sum / Gemfile.lock 等) で `studio-42/elfinder` を grep し、稼働しているサービス・バージョンを把握する。
-
3Hunt for indicators of compromise detect
grep 'GET /secret.txt' /var/log/nginx/access.log | grep -E '(unusual_payload|sqli_pattern)'アクセスログで `GET /secret.txt` への異常なリクエスト (不正な認証ヘッダ・SQLメタ文字)を過去 30〜90日分捜索。WAF/SIEM があれば該当パスのアラート発火履歴を確認。
-
6Apply patch patch
Upgrade studio-42/elfinder to 2.1.70ステージング環境で 2.1.70 に上げて回帰テスト → 本番反映。回帰テストはアプリの主要ハッピーパスと、Step 3 で見つけた異常検知の続報チェックを含めること。
-
7Post-deployment verification verify
Replay attack against GET /secret.txt on staging to confirm patch closes the vectorパッチ適用後、ステージングで PoC または同等の悪用パターンを再現して脆弱性が閉じたことを確認。本番では Step 3 と同じログクエリでアラート再発が無いか継続監視。
Affected packages
composer
studio-42/elfinder
[{"type":"ECOSYSTEM","events":[{"introduced":"0"},{"fixed":"2.1.70"}]}]
References
- web https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/commit/191372c1bbebbd36fb55af79a84b9984861390ff
- web https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/commit/6d997386cd0f1abab4706c220b46b0aea0ecff51
- web https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/releases/tag/2.1.70
- web https://github.com/Studio-42/elFinder/security/advisories/GHSA-8x3q-jpjh-qh5c
- web https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-8x3q-jpjh-qh5c