Sign in Sign up
JA · EN · FR
SecPulse
Categories
CVE-2026-97985

Vulnerability in Linux kernel (CVE-2026-97985)

Summary

Vulnerability in Linux kernel (CVE-2026-97985). Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure.

Original description

The description as published by the source.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

af_unix: Update last skb marker in manage_oob().

Fahad Alharbi reported that blocking recv(MSG_PEEK) could hog CPU
due to OOB skb.

In the following cases, manage_oob() skips OOB skb(s) and returns
NULL for the last recv(MSG_PEEK):

socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, sk);

  1. skb -> OOB skb -> NULL
    send(sk[0], "ab", 2, MSG_OOB);
    recv(sk[1], buf, 0, MSG_PEEK);

  2. skb -> consumed OOB skb -> NULL
    send(sk[0], "ab", 2, MSG_OOB);
    recv(sk[1], buf, 1, MSG_OOB);
    recv(sk[1], buf, 0, MSG_PEEK);

  3. consumed OOB skb -> OOB skb -> NULL
    send(sk[0], "a", 1, MSG_OOB);
    recv(sk[1], buf, 0, MSG_OOB);
    send(sk[0], "b", 1, MSG_OOB);
    recv(sk[1], buf, 1, MSG_PEEK);

Then, @copied is 0 in unix_stream_read_generic() (zero-length buffer,
or non-OOB skb is not yet consumed), and unix_stream_data_wait() is
called.

However, it returns immediately because @last is not updated in
unix_stream_read_generic(), and the thread busy-waits for a new skb.

Let's update @last in manage_oob().

For MSG_PEEK, @last is updated with the skipped OOB, and for the
non-peek case, @last matches the returned value (when !copied)
because OOB is unlinked.

Note that manage_oob() is inlined and no stack canary is added.

Source: NIST National Vulnerability Database NVD GitHub Advisory

Auto-generated summary

Assembled by SecPulse from the source data (CVSS, CWE, affected versions) using templates — no AI involved. Check the original description and references below for exact details.

A vulnerability tracked as CVE-2026-97985 has been found in Linux kernel.
Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure.
What to do: apply the vendor's official patched release.
If unsure, ask your IT team or search "Linux kernel CVE-2026-97985" on the vendor's site.

CVE-2026-97985 (Linux kernel)
Plan: 1) Audit SBOM/dependencies, 2) Stage→prod upgrade, 3) Add WAF/proxy monitoring on affected endpoints, 4) Hunt IOCs in logs.
Refs: see the GHSA / vendor advisory / patched release linked on this page.

❓ What is the problem

A vulnerability (unclassified) exists in Linux kernel.

📍 Affected scope

Check the vendor advisory for the affected versions of Linux kernel.

🔥 Severity

Severity: ?. Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure.

🔧 How to fix

Update to the patched release per vendor advisory.

🛡️ Workaround

Until the patch is applied: disable the affected feature, apply WAF rules, or restrict access via network ACLs.

🔍 Detection

Search webserver/proxy logs for unusual request patterns matching this CVE's known IOCs. Audit SBOM/dependencies to find affected services.

Response actions

Concrete steps and command examples for SOC/SRE teams to execute in order

  1. 1
    Identify exposure identify 
    Audit SBOM/dependencies for affected components.

    資産台帳・SBOM・依存マニフェストで Linux kernel を使っているサービスとバージョンを洗い出す。

  2. 2
    Post-deployment verification verify 
    Confirm patched version is live in production

    パッチ適用後、ステージングで PoC または同等の悪用パターンを再現して脆弱性が閉じたことを確認。本番ではアクセスログ・WAF でアラート再発が無いか継続監視。

References

We use cookies for analytics and ad measurement. This setting applies to all Game co., Ltd. sites. Details