Security update for python-Django
Summary
Vulnerability reported (SUSE-SU-2026:1740-1). Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure. Exploitable via ASGIRequest.
Original description
The description as published by the source.
This update for python-Django fixes the following issues
- CVE-2026-3902: headers spoofing by exploiting an ambiguous mapping of two header variants in
ASGIRequestrequests
(bsc#1261729). - CVE-2026-4277: permissions on inline model instances were not validated on submission of forged POST data in
GenericInlineModelAdmin (bsc#1261731). - CVE-2026-4292: admin changelist forms using ModelAdmin.list_editable incorrectly allowed new instances to be created
via forged POST data (bsc#1261732). - CVE-2026-5766: potential denial-of-service vulnerability in ASGI requests via file upload limit bypass (bsc#1264153).
- CVE-2026-6907: potential exposure of private data due to incorrect handling of
Vary: *inUpdateCacheMiddleware
(bsc#1264152). - CVE-2026-33033: denial of service via missing or understated Content-Length header in ASGI requests (bsc#1261722).
- CVE-2026-33034: ASGI requests with a missing or understated Content-Length header could bypass the
DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZElimit when reading HttpRequest.body (bsc#1261724). - CVE-2026-35192: session fixation via public cached pages and
SESSION_SAVE_EVERY_REQUEST(bsc#1264154).
Source: OSV.dev (Open Source Vulnerabilities) OSV
Auto-generated summary
Assembled by SecPulse from the source data (CVSS, CWE, affected versions) using templates — no AI involved. Check the original description and references below for exact details.
A vulnerability tracked as SUSE-SU-2026:1740-1 has been found.
Attackers can target a specific entry point like ASGIRequest over the network to misuse the product.
Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure.
What to do: apply the vendor's official patched release.
If unsure, ask your IT team or search "SUSE-SU-2026:1740-1" on the vendor's site.
SUSE-SU-2026:1740-1
Attack surface: ASGIRequest / UpdateCacheMiddleware / DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE / SESSION_SAVE_EVERY_REQUEST
Plan: 1) Audit SBOM/dependencies, 2) Stage→prod upgrade, 3) Add WAF/proxy monitoring on affected endpoints, 4) Hunt IOCs in logs.
Refs: see the GHSA / vendor advisory / patched release linked on this page.
A vulnerability (unclassified) has been reported. Attackers reach the vulnerable code path via ASGIRequest.
Check the vendor advisory for the affected versions. Attack surface: ASGIRequest / UpdateCacheMiddleware / DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE / SESSION_SAVE_EVERY_REQUEST.
Severity: ?. Risk of unauthorized operations or information disclosure.
Update to the patched release per vendor advisory.
Until the patch is applied: disable the affected feature, apply WAF rules, or restrict access via network ACLs.
Search webserver/proxy logs for unusual request patterns matching this CVE's known IOCs. Audit SBOM/dependencies to find affected services.
Response actions
Concrete steps and command examples for SOC/SRE teams to execute in order
-
1Identify exposure identify
Audit SBOM/dependencies for affected components.資産台帳・SBOM・依存マニフェストで影響コンポーネントを特定する。
-
2Post-deployment verification verify
Confirm patched version is live in productionパッチ適用後、ステージングで PoC または同等の悪用パターンを再現して脆弱性が閉じたことを確認。本番ではアクセスログ・WAF でアラート再発が無いか継続監視。
References
- advisory suse.com
- report bugzilla.suse.com
- report bugzilla.suse.com
- report bugzilla.suse.com
- report bugzilla.suse.com
- report bugzilla.suse.com
- report bugzilla.suse.com
- report bugzilla.suse.com
- report bugzilla.suse.com
- web suse.com
- web suse.com
- web suse.com
- web suse.com
- web suse.com
- web suse.com
- web suse.com
- web suse.com